Total Pageviews

Choose language: Spanish, French, Russian I have checked.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

LENINGRAD: HOT WAR TO COLD WAR

Leningrad, Moscow, Kiev, Baku, Moscow, Vienna, Prague

     One day in the Spring of 1969, when Jim and Tom and Mike and Mark and I were about to graduate from Colorado College, my feared-and-beloved Russian teacher, Mariamna Soudakova, told our second-year class that a program was being organized by Southern Illinois University for a group of students who already had serious language study to spend the summer in Leningrad in an intensive course with native Russian teachers who spoke no other language. She asked for a show of hands: “Who’s interested?” Two or three hands went up from the small class.
     Mara was a wonderful teacher, beautiful and fierce, which had a way of being both a blessing and a curse. Her family had fled Soviet Russia, and as a young woman she had found herself in Japanese-occupied Shanghai during WWII. I remember her telling how she had been married there with her leg in a cast, but giving no further details. I always regretted not hearing the rest of that story.
     When she looked at someone, demanding that person’s attention, there was no doubt as to who was the subject of her gaze. Now she looked at me.
     “Aren’t you interested?”
     “I’d love to go, but I can’t afford it. I have to work this summer,” I answered.
     “I did not ask if you could afford it,” she snarled. “I asked..for people..to show hands..if you are interested.” She paused, letting her eyes do their work.
     “Are..you..interested?
     “Sure I’m interested. But...”
     “Then raise..your..hand.”
     After class, the two of us talked. I repeated that I simply couldn’t afford the cost of transportation; couldn’t even afford to take the summer off work. She fixed me with her squinty tiger eyes: “Dean, you are going to the Soviet Union if I have to hock my car.”
     Somebody scraped together a thousand dollars to send me to Leningrad for the summer. It was clear that Mara had put that in motion. I didn’t find out how, or who was the source of the money, until my wife and I were having gin and tonics in Mara’s apartment in Colorado Springs twenty years later during a class reunion.

     I was with a delightful group of people, students who were mostly about 4 years younger than me because of my hitch with Uncle Sam. They were intelligent, decent, and to a person thrilled to be embarked on such an adventure.
     I shared their excitement, but never truly fit in. My Vietnam experiences led to some very interesting conversations – I still remember one on an airliner when we very animatedly discussed a then-current Esquire article about Vietnam by Michael Herr, which later became part of his book Dispatches. So we had things to talk about, and did. But besides being occasional material for conversation, my experiences, and the way I carried them, set me apart. That was much more my fault than theirs.
     We took a Soviet passenger liner from London to Copenhagen, then to Helsinki, then to Leningrad. The two things I remember about the trip were the pastries in Copenhagen and a moment in the ship’s bar when an on-duty ship’s officer came in, paused at the bar, ordered and quaffed a water glass of vodka as if it were, well, water - and went back to work.
     Our classroom was on an upper floor of a drab Soviet-era building of the Leningradskii Politekhnicheskii Institut at the end of a tram-ride from the older part of the city built on the banks of the River Nevá 300 years ago by Peter the Great.
     It was an interesting time to be in Leningrad. The Vietnam War was still in its most violent months; I had spent the previous summer in Vietnam and Laos and Cambodia as a journalist and two years before that had been a combatant in Vietnam. Now I was living and studying with citizens of the superpower that supported the other side. The North Vietnamese students lived one or two floors above us, and at least once lowered anti-imperialist notes on strings down in front of our windows. A sign in the lobby, which we walked past at least twice a day, said “Brotherly greetings to the courageous Vietnamese people, leading the heroic struggle against the aggression of American imperialism for the freedom and independence of your homeland!”
     The plan for our summer studies was to attend Russian language classes for five hours each morning, break for a late lunch, then in the afternoons visit a Soviet historical site. These excursions were, of course, organized by our watchdogs from Intourist, the Soviet tourist agency.
     One day, after language classes and lunch, the bus was loading for a historical site. I believe it was the Finland Station, where Lenin had re-entered the country in 1917 in a sealed railroad car after his exile in Europe.         
     Nearly everyone was aboard. I told a couple of people I’d see them later, and turned to go. “Where are you going? We’re ready to leave.” “I’m not going with you. I think I’ll miss this one, go into the city, hang out in Letnii Sad, see if anybody wants to talk.” I was, and am, always hungry for stories. Letnii Sad was the justly famous Summer Garden, a large lovely park in Leningrad where people strolled with their families when not working, and where old people sat on park benches and enjoyed the brief weeks of summer sun before the recently-departed northern winter came howling back.
     It seemed as if winter had arrived the moment I spoke. A couple of our new Russian friends had come to the bus to see us off; I saw fear suddenly invade what had been smiling faces. The Intourist guy was particularly dour. His darkest fear was looming: less than 100% participation. There goes my perfect record for the week... here comes an ass-chewing by the Boss...
     At first he tried being nice: “How would you feel if we were visiting the United States, and we refused to go to a famous place where George Washington did one of his great deeds?” But he wasn’t nice. Not really. He was a scared petty bureaucrat whose meal ticket was based on his ohsoslightly privileged position in a system which could crash down on him with awful force if the slightest ripple in the perfect Soviet pond could be traced to him. I didn’t like him, I didn’t like the other cheerleaders like him with their phony enthusiasm, and I was tired of pretending that I did.
     “Fine by me. If you wanna go, go. If you don’t, don’t. George Washington’s not going to care, and nobody else probably is either.” I turned to leave.
     “Dean...” he played his last card, with a shrug that said he was sorry he had to do it, but he had to pull rank. “This excursion is mandatory.” But “mandatory” is too weak a word here. The word he used was obyazatyel’no, one of two words I remember from that summer which, when pronounced, seemed to initiate a great cosmic grinding of the gears of the State, set in motion to reduce the bones of the offender in question to a greasy spot on the sidewalk. The other word was vospreshchën: forbidden. If something was obyazatel’no, you did it, period. If something was bospreshchën, you did not do it. Also period.
     But I didn’t go along that day, or any of the other days when I chose not to; and the next time I saw the Intourist guy he didn’t have a hatchet buried in his back, and pretty much left me alone. Maybe he and the other apparatchiki decided to write me off as a bad apple, and cut their losses at 94% participation, or whatever it was. I frankly didn’t give a rat’s ass, as we would have said in the Marine Corps.

     A few of us met one evening for a sort of clandestine little party – clandestine meaning only that there were no Party minders present – with some Russians we’d met about our age. It was the only time I ever saw anyone open a bottle of wine by wrapping a towel around the bottom of the bottle and slamming it so hard against a concrete wall the cork was forced out the top. What was pretty much agreed on for the evening was that we would just talk, frankly, as people, saying whatever we wanted to say about our lives, without worrying that somebody’d get in trouble for speaking freely.
     I remember being in a conversation that night with a young Russian guy and asking him, “So. Are you going to join the Party?” His response lodged in my brain so thoroughly that, almost 40 years later, I still remember the Russian: “Nu, konechno. Byez etovo, nedalyeko ne uidyësh.” It would translate as Well, of course. Without that, you don’t get far.”  But there’s a nuance to the u prefix which means “to go away from a place or situation,” and can also carry a sense of escape, or fleeing, that reminds me of the Mexican phrase salsipuedes: get out if you can. Of poverty, that is. There’s an earthquake fault (and some other geographical features) in California named salsipuedes. The young would-be Communist, in that honest moment, reminded me of business-oriented college students in the United States who “just want to get ahead.”
        
     I had read about the Russian Revolution, and had taken an excellent course in Soviet politics from Professor David Finley. I remember a story told by Professor Finley in his Soviet Politics class. But to retell it, I have to say something about Russians and ice cream.
     The main thing I remember about food that summer is that I don’t remember it. Soviet food, to my taste, served to get you through the day, not to make it special. Sort of like English food. But ice cream was a different story. Someone had said that Russians made a lot of ice cream because, while their milk production was high, their ability to keep liquid milk refrigerated lagged behind their ability to keep it frozen. Possibly because for half the year, at least in a place so far north as Leningrad, little energy was required to keep anything frozen.
     Russians famously loved their ice cream, and with reason: it was wonderful. Our favorite treat that summer – mine, anyway – was a champagne float from one of the shops along Nevsky Prospekt. The champagne was good, too. Anyway, Professor Finley’s story went like this. He began by telling of Napoleon’s invasion of Russia in 1812 at the head of half a million soldiers. The Russian General Kutuzov, knowing better than to tackle the behemoth army head-on, kept pulling back and harrassing Napoleon’s flanks, using up the summer, abandoning Moscow. By mid-October, Napoleon had to leave with nothing to show for his invasion except a great city with no people. The Russian winter, and Kutuzov’s army, whittled his army to ten thousand survivors, and crushed his power in Europe.
     That was the preamble to his story about Churchill and Stalin. It seems that at the bleakest point in the battle on Germany’s Eastern Front, when Stalingrad was in danger of falling to the German Army, the two leaders were in Stalin’s office in the Kremlin, overlooking Red Square. They were glumly discussing the bleak prospects of holding Stalingrad, which, if it fell, would loose the German army’s tanks into the Russian heartland, threatening the entire Allied war effort.
     They were looking out Stalin’s window at a snowy mid-winter scene in Red Square. There were two long lines of people in the square, bundled against the cold. “What are those people waiting in line for?” Churchill asked.
     “Well, the shorter line is people waiting to go through Lenin’s tomb.” (In 1969, it was still there in Red Square, tucked close to the Kremlin Wall. Lenin’s head and shrunken body were on visible display – the body covered by a silk drape - in a sealed glass case, which we and other visitors filed past.)
     “And the longer line? What are they waiting for?”
     “Ice cream,” Stalin replied.
     Churchill was stunned. “Ice cream?”
     “Ice cream. We Russians love our ice cream.”
     Churchill pondered that a long moment, then said, “If those people are waiting in that cold for ice cream, Hitler doesn’t have a chance.”
     And so it was.

     Professor Finley’s classes had given me a jump-start toward understanding the history and politics that were wrapped up in the places we visited that summer, the people we met, and the language we spoke. But now I had a chance to actually walk the ground of those events of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the Blockade of Leningrad from 1941 to 1944.
     Once after class I was walking along the sidewalk that forms a cap for the concrete channel of the River Nevá where it runs alongside the Hermitage Art Museum. (In 1917, the Hermitage was still the Winter Palace.) In the tumultuous days of that October, the cruiser Avrora was in the channel of the Nevá near the Winter Palace. Some of the sailors had already switched their loyalties to the Bolsheviks([1]), and the crew refused an order to steam out of the river. On the evening of October 25 (New Style: before the revolution, the Russian nation used a calendar that was 13 days behind the one we use now. So October 25[N.S.] was October 12 [O.S.]), the Avrora fired a blank round from one of her 6” guns at the palace. Kerensky’s fragile constitutional government gave up: the Avrora was right across the street!
     That same day I walked from a spot on the bank of the Nevá near where the Avrora had been that day in 1917 – I think it was a couple of kilometers or so - to where Lenin and Trotsky had their headquarters at Smolny, which had been a school for daughters of noble families before events canceled that category of persons and gave the building a new purpose.

     One afternoon I went to Piskaryovskoye Kladbishche, alone, and the promise I had made to myself that August day three years before, throwing my weapons and gear aboard the truck to leave Chu Lai, changed somehow. I didn’t suddenly have any answers to the question Why war? which had been the lens through which I saw much of life since then, and would be for decades to come. But, in a moment and then for the hours I spent at Piskaryovskoe, the magnitude of what I needed to understand became clearer to me. The destruction and misery I had taken part in at Tho An had affected me so profoundly as to become the major turning point in my life, but this....
     There is a small museum in one of the blocky pavilions at the entrance. It contains a German document dated September 29, 1941([2]), containing Hitler’s orders for the reduction of Leningrad, in three languages. The English translation reads, in part:
         1. To achieve clarity in the Naval War Fleet’s measures in the event of the capture or surrender of Petersburg([3]), the Chief of the Staff of the Naval War leadership raised the question of further war measures as regards this city with the General War Command. This document informs about the answer.


2. Der Fuhrer decided to wipe the city of Petersburg off the face of the earth. After the defeat of Soviet Russia there is no interest in the further existence of this large population concentration. [About 3 million at the start of the war.]

         ....

         4. It is proposed to blockade the city tightly, and through artillery shelling with all calibres and uninterrupted air bombardment, level it with the ground. If as a consequence of the following situation in the city requests about surrender are made, they will be denied, as the problems of defending and feeding the population cannot and shall not be solved by us. From our side, in this war for life and death, there is no interest in keeping even a part of the population of this large city.

Also in the museum is a photograph of Tatyana Savicheva, with a copy of the final pages of her diary. (I had seen reproductions of those pages in Salisbury’s book.) Tanya had had a thick diary before the blockade, but had burned it for heat. Her sister Nina had disappeared (she had been evacuated without the family’s knowledge); their mother then gave Tanya a notebook which had been Nina’s. In pages of her new diary from late December 1941 to May 1942, Tanya recorded the deaths of her family, one death to a page, in large writing: her sister Zhenya, her grandmother, her brother, her uncle Vasya, her uncle Lesha, and her mother. The last three entries are: “Savichevs died. Everyone died. Only Tanya is left.” She was 11 years old.
     In August 1942, she was one of 140 children evacuated through the blockade. She died on July 1, 1944, of disease resulting from the siege.

     I walked through the squared arch at the entrance and stopped. Funereal music
broad paved paths stretched from the entrance to what was clearly a monument at the far end. The monument was too far away for me to discern its shape, but I was in no hurry. I had come to Piskaryovskoye determined to stay until I was ready to leave, with
no pressures from friends or itineraries; if possible, with no pressure from anyone or anything other than the reality I already knew was there. I wanted to experience the place alone, and quietly, without discussion or historical analysis by me or others.
     I had read Harrison Salisbury’s monumental The 900 Days before leaving Colorado Springs for Europe and the Soviet Union. So I knew that this city had lost the better part of a million people – no one knows how many - during the German blockade of the city from September 1941 to January 1944. And I knew that, although there had been many military and civilian deaths from bombing, artillery, and combat on the outskirts of the city, most of the dead – military and civilian men, women, children (many, many children), - had perished of starvation and freezing. And I knew that about 600,000 of them were here, to my right and my left and all around, in Piskaryovskoe. Six..hundred..thousand. Give or take.
     Since I heard my first scream from a child terrified by armed soldiers –  one of whom was me – or saw my first bullet hole, up close, in a human being, no number of casualties, no number of dead or wounded or missing, has ever made me see or imagine that number. I see, instead, the bullet holes, and my imagination multiplies the wounds, visually.

     The broad paved paths toward the monument were bounded by mounds – each, I would say, 24” to 30” high. Each measured, oh, eight or ten paces along its narrow edge, that being the edge that bordered the walkway, either right or left. The long leg of each rectangle was maybe twice the length of the short leg. Each mound had sides sloped from base to top, and grass grew on the sides and tops of the mounds and on the earth between.
     At the end of any given mound that bordered on the path to the monument was a simple stone into which was chiseled a year: 1941 (there were many mounds marked 1941), 1942 (many), 1943 (many), 1944 (not so many; the blokada had been broken in January of that year), and a symbol: hammer and sickle for civilian remains, a star for military remains. 800 railroad cars of granite were brought from the Ukraine for these stones, and for the other memorial works in Piskaryovskoye.
     I walked in, slowly. And walking slowly, I came abreast of the only human within my near vision, an old woman in a dark coat and gray shawl. She was seated on one of the stones marked 1942. Her head was bowed. She was silent and still.
     I walked past her, past more mounds, past more mounds, past more mounds..past more mounds. The monument at the end of the paths was nearer. Then I was there. It is a statue of Mother Russia. She is a strong woman with arms spread wide in a gesture of openness, welcome, generosity, and a pleading question. The physical attitude of her open arms at once embraces and offers the bones of all the Leningraders in all the graves. She holds an oak branch between her outstretched hands. She stands in front of a granite wall inscribed with a poem. The poem is by Olga Berggolts, who lived through the entire siege in Leningrad. (So did the great Soviet composer Dmitri Shostakovich, who refused Stalin’s offer to smuggle him out of the city, choosing instead to stay with his people.)
     Berggolts’ poem is Rekviem: Requiem. The poem’s best known line is near the middle:
         No one is forgotten, and nothing is forgotten.

     One night I came back to the Institute – not for the first or last time – on the last tram from the heart of the city. It was during White Nights – June, the longest days of the year, and with Leningrad so close to the Arctic Circle, even a while after one o’clock in the morning it wasn’t dark. A gaggle of other students from the Institute had ridden the same tram, and as we unloaded ourselves in front of the dormitory, something about the warm, reluctantly fading light seemed to cast a convivial character on the place and the people. It probably also had something to do with the fact that most of us had been drinking. Leningrad in 1969 was at the height – or depth – of the Soviet era, with not a neon sign advertising doughnuts or jewelry, or other corrupt pleasures, to be seen. The city was as drab as the stones it was made of.
     Still, bars could be found on back streets of the city, and I had found at least a couple, after long walks. So, apparently, had the other students who now milled about in front of the dormitory (on this night, no other Americans), all of us seized by a reluctance to give up the day that reminded me of Walt Whitman’s        
        
Something to eke out a minute additional—shadows of nightfall                                                                                                    deepening,
                                            ...loth, O so loth to depart!
         Garrulous to the very last.

     But we didn’t know what to do. We were from all over the world – Cubans and other Latinos, Africans from various nations, some Asians, some eastern Europeans - people from every place where the Soviet Union had influence or was trying to aquire it. Some smatterings of conversation started, in Russian because that was our common language. But it was halting. The group’s energy had us milling about like a school of fish or a flock of birds, then found its center: some African guy produced a tired and venerable guitar, began to strum it, began to sing. It took hold, among every goddamned one of us, no matter our first language, and we were braying into the sky that refused to darken:
         Hey, Jude (beat, beat) don’t let me down (beat, beat)
         sing a sad song, and make it be-eh-eh-tter...

     The last week in July I was in a laundromat I had found after much searching in the back streets of an industrial part of the city I’d taken to prowling in the afternoons, partly because I’d found a place near one of the factories where there was sometimes parked a trailer that looked like the “water buffalo” trailers we’d had in Vietnam for the awful-tasting but safe drinking water that the Seabees purified for us. Indeed, it was a WWII – era vehicle, and could well have survived from the months of American aid to the Soviet Army during that war.
     Only this trailer held kvass, a sort of Russian brown beer. The guy operating the trailer had a couple of generous-sized glass mugs, and you’d stand in line until it was your turn, he’d open the cock and pour you one, you’d step aside and drink it so someone else could use the mug, then get back in line.
     The laundromat was nearby, and it was my first time there. So of course I had trouble figuring out the system. The stolid woman who staffed the booth in the corner sat silently through all my frustrations until I walked up and pleaded for help. You had to buy this little cardboard ticket, she informed me reluctantly, then cross the room back to the machine and insert your ticket. (It seemed to some of us that most of the Russian folks who worked in restaurants, public buildings, and other places which in the West would have been considered “service” jobs, were a grumpy lot. This for a simple reason: they weren’t serving us, the public. They were serving The People in the form of The State, and didn’t much give a damn what individual people thought of their comportment or service. They’d as soon scold you as look at you.)
     But still the machine wouldn’t work. I went back to the lady in the corner. “Nado zhdat’:” You have to wait.
     So I returned to the machine and stared at it for a while longer, and it finally, in its own sweet time, kicked itself into gear. I sat down to read and wait.
     A Russian guy came in with his laundry. He looked like somebody from one of the factories. It apparently was his first time too. He put his laundry in the machine and thumped it and looked around in bewilderment. Not wanting to expose myself as a foreigner, especially an American, I told him in simple phrases that he had to buy a ticket from the lady in the corner and put it in the machine. (Again, she was stonily silent through his frustrations.) I deliberately laid my book on the machine near him so he could see its title; it was Marshal Georgi Zhukov’s memoirs, in Russian. Maybe it’d spark him to tell a story or express an opinion. He was a working man; so far, we were comfortable with each other.
     But his conversation got a little ahead of me, he used a word I didn’t recognize, and I asked him to explain it. He took a sidelong glance at my book, which was quite thick (and which I was reading very slowly), and asked me, “You mean you’re not Russian?” The jig was up. “Nope,” I said, “I’m American. I’m just here studying Russian.”
     His face lit up: “You’re American? Really? That’s very good.” He was pleased. Americans had landed on the moon a couple of days before, and Russians were generally thrilled by it, including my new working-class friend. Our whole class had watched TV coverage of the moonwalk along with some Russians, and they seemed as excited as we were. So we blabbed for a while about his life and mine. He paused and looked around, obviously to see who might be listening. Then he leaned close to me and asked conspiratorially, “Tell me. Do you really have unemployment in your country?” He’d clearly heard some of his government’s propaganda, and just as clearly didn’t know how much of it to believe.
     “Yup. Quite a bit, actually.”
     He looked around, saw the coast was still clear, then leaned in again. “Don’t let ‘em kid ya...” he tapped his chest – “so do we.”

     On one of our last days of class before graduation in late July, we had a visitor, a man who was the director of the language program at the Institute. Our teacher, a stalwart woman in her fifties, introduced him and respectfully stood aside.
     The gentleman was generally relaxed and friendly, asked us how we’d liked our classes, what we thought of the quality of instruction, that sort of thing. It was easy to give a civil answer: I don’t remember anyone saying that the instruction was less than very good or excellent. I certainly agreed.
     But the encounter settled into a conversation involving how to ask for a knife, fork, and spoon and such things in a restaurant, which I thought was a waste of the director’s time, and ours. He’d invited us to ask questions. So I raised my hand.
     My question was something like this: This is Leningrad, the city of the Blockade. You have hundreds of thousands of your people buried here in Piskaryovskoye Kladbishche. You had Stalin. You had the Battle of Stalingrad. Right now your country and ours are in a struggle that could result in a nuclear confrontation, and are on opposite sides of a war in Southeast Asia. Shouldn’t we be talking about something more serious than knives and forks?
     The director got quiet and looked down for a long moment, then looked back up at me. I’d thought he might get angry, but he didn’t. “You speak Russian very well,” he said, then turned and left the room.

     In early August we found ourselves in Kyiv (then usually transliterated “Kiev,”), the capital city of Ukraine, which was still a Soviet Republic.
     I remember our group being aboard a bus in or near the city, and someone – the driver, or our Intourist guide, who would likely have been Ukrainian – pointing off to the right and saying “Babii Yar is right over there.” Of course we were familiar with Yevgenii Yevtushenko’s powerful poem, “Babii Yar,” about the history of the ravine where, on September 29-30, 1941, Nazi SS soldiers and Ukrainian police marched the city’s Jewish population to the edge of the ravine, forced them to undress, killed them with machine guns and pistols so that they fell into the ravine, and buried them, caving successive sections of the ravine’s bank onto each new layer of corpses.([4]) Apparently to conserve ammunition, the SS soldiers, who did the actual shooting, did not shoot the younger children, but tossed them into the ravine to be buried alive. The official Nazi count of executed Jews was 33,771, but Soviet and other more objective observers put the total of people shot and buried in the ravine at Babii Yar, in the period beginning that September 29, at nearly 100,000, of whom about 80,000 were Jews.([5])
     A 12½-year-old boy named Anatoly Kuznetsov who lived in the area, apparently not considered a dangerous witness by the Nazis because of his youth, and because he was not Jewish, hung around and watched events and kept a diary. He continued to watch and record his observations in following months as the Germans brought new groups of prisoners, including Gypsies and Soviet POW’s, to the ravine, executed, and buried them. Kuznetsov compiled his notes into Babii Yar: A Document in the Form of a Novel, recorded it on 35mm film, and smuggled it out when he later defected to England from the Soviet Union. The book includes the story of one of very few known survivors of those two days, a young children’s drama teacher named Dina Mironovna Pronicheva, whose father was Russian and mother a Ukrainian Jew. Standing in a line along the cliff above Babii Yar with other Jews about to be shot, she decided to jump instead. She survived the fall onto the corpses below, played dead until after dark, and escaped the corpse-filled ravine. She later told the story to Kuznetsov, who included it in his book.
     In 1961, the young Soviet poet Yevgenii Yevtushenko, who had heard about the murders at Babii Yar and had also heard of Soviet plans to build a sports stadium at the site, visited the place. Anatoly Kuznetsov was his guide. Yevtushenko was so moved by the visit and the knowledge he now carried and by his own government’s apparent disrespect toward the meaning of the entire episode, that he wrote his famous poem, Babii Yar, he says, in one day.
     The poem’s opening is
                  Over Babii Yar
                           there are no monuments.
     The line refers both to the Soviet propensity to memorialize everything to do with Nazi atrocities and Soviet suffering in World War II, and the resounding silence about Babii Yar, with its attendant complicity by Soviet authorities – in the silence – and by Ukrainian police and civilians, in the original deeds.
     The poem changed things. The sports stadium was not built. At least two monuments were finally erected, and a pleasant park now exists near that terrible ravine which had gone from being a mass grave to being a garbage dump. The world’s attention was called to the virulent strain of anti-Semitism present among both Russians and Ukrainians. That anti-Semitism was exacerbated by Soviet repression of subject Ukrainians, who sometimes supported Nazis out of a desire to be free of Soviet domination, to the point of complicity in the Nazi genocidal campaign against Jews.
     So what had begun as a young poet’s angry and principled attempt to stop the building of a sports stadium at a place which he thought should be preserved and memorialized turned into such a profound national and international recognition of the truth of what he said in the poem that Yevtushenko soon began filling existing sports stadiums with people who came to hear him read his poems – chief among them being Babii Yar.
     I’ve heard and read comments to the effect that Yevtushenko’s fame, and his ego, are bigger than his poetic ability, and that may be so. But sometimes there’s more to a piece of writing than its artfulness, and here I choose to defend Yevtushenko. He spoke a naked truth that needed to be spoken, while others danced around it. I even heard such a criticism of him from Mara Soudakova. I also heard her say once, in class as we spoke of favorite authors and I mentioned Hemingway, “Pah! Hemingway was a journalist!”
     Okay. So was Walt Whitman, and so was, and is, Gabriel García Márquez. Having been a working journalist and, on some of my better days, a poet, I consider the two vocations closely related, when they’re done well: you pay attention to the deeper realities of the situation before you, and you struggle to get it right in language.

     We flew from Kyiv to Baku, Azerbaijan, on the Caspian Sea. My memories are of a sere landscape punctuated by oil-drilling and –refining equipment belching black smoke into a sky that was still trying to be blue, and music on the radio from Iran, Azerbaijan’s next-door neighbor. And surrendering my beautiful Zodiac Seawolf indestructible diving watch, which I had bought with a Lance Corporal’s pay in the Post Exchange at Camp Sukiran, Okinawa, to a watch repairman near the beach, emphasizing that all I needed was a new pin for the band. Then I’d listened to his hammering for twenty minutes behind a curtain, to do a job I could have done with the tip of a blade of my pocket knife in 30 seconds, if he’d just sold me the pin. (The pins were spring-loaded; all they required was to flick out the old one, compress the spring on the new one, and slip it into place.) I’d gone swimming the next day in the Caspian Sea only to watch my treasured watch fill up with water before my eyes. It brought to mind the “red vs. expert” duel in the Soviet Army during WWII, when the parallel command structures of career military officers with combat experience sharing authority with political commissars who tended to be professional ideologues in charge of each unit’s doctrinal purity. My watch was a relatively tiny case, but related: the guy didn’t actually have to know what he was doing, because his job was protected by ideology.
     The putative reason for our visit to Baku was to give us a short holiday after more than a month of rigorous study, and to allow us to socialize with Soviet students our age who were there at a Komsomol (the Communist Party’s youth organization) recreation camp. I don’t remember ever being told decision-making details about the formation of our itinerary, but come on: the People’s Republic of Viet Nam, the Soviet Union’s proxy, at least in terms of financial, ideological, and armament support, was currently waging a very hot war against our proxy, the Republic of (South) Viet Nam, in which United States troops – recently including me – were massively involved. Of course our presence in the Soviet Union that summer, and in Baku in particular, was a ripple, albeit a small one, in the Cold War pond. Somewhere up the respective chains of authority – both of them - the changing of hearts and minds was being talked about.
     One evening at a dance at the camp in Baku, I noticed an obsidian-haired, dark-eyed beauty on the dance floor who didn’t seem to be attached to anyone in particular, who was just having fun in the company of some girl friends. Fantasies I’d formed while reading poems by Pushkin and Yesenin about gypsy lovers were probably tangled up with this real woman I’d managed to cross paths with, and - uncharacteristically of me (I was notoriously shy in the company of women, even in more familiar circumstances) – I marched onto the floor and asked her to dance. Astonishingly, she smiled and said yes. Her name was Tatyana Shevtsova. We danced a few times that evening, and I visited her tent the next day, which she shared with two other women, who greeted me and quietly made excuses for leaving so Tatyana and I could be alone for a little while. I remember being surprised and delighted when she asked if I’d seen the French movie Sherburgskiye Zontiki (The Umbrellas of Cherbourg), and talking about it for a while and discovering that we both liked it a lot.
     We wrote letters back and forth for some time after I started graduate school in the fall in the History of Consciousness program at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Tatyana returned to her home in Khabarovsk, on the Amur River in Soviet Siberia, very near the Chinese border and not far north of Vladivostok.([6]) Her father was a Soviet Army officer there. Our correspondence went along nicely until I decided to broach The Big Issue – the possibility of nuclear war between her country and mine – and mentioned Herman Kahn’s book, Thinking about the Unthinkable, and suggested that we talk about it, or at least about the subject. I never heard from her again. I hoped her father didn’t get in trouble over our letters and get sent to... well. He was already in Siberia.
                          
     We were back in Moscow after Kyiv and Baku, and were waiting in line for our Aeroflot flight to Vienna. As was usual with me – for that matter, with most Vietnam vets I know – I was so uncomfortable in lines and crowded places that I waited for the end of the line before boarding.
     Someone else was waiting: a woman in about her fifties seemed to be gingerly keeping herself apart from everyone else, waiting like me for the press of bodies to clear before boarding the plane. I felt a kinship with her, and began to watch her. She had a fresh bandage on her throat. She seemed nervous; maybe that was the reason.
     We landed in Vienna and were ushered into a large lounge seething with travelers heading many directions, with announcements of arriving and departing flights closely following one another in German, French, and English. At any moment, there must have been a couple of hundred people in the room, or passing into or out of it. We were told we’d have to wait in that lounge for our flight to Prague, because we had no visas to leave the airport and enter the city.
     I noticed the woman with the bandage at her throat who had boarded the flight from Moscow at the same time I had, sitting among other passengers. There were people all around her, but she seemed alone. There were virtually no seats vacant; besides I felt more comfortable moving. I walked around the lounge, stopped to chat with some fellow students, walked around some more. My attention kept coming back to the woman with the bandage. The more I looked at her – trying to be unobtrusive about it – the more I thought that, although she made no movements and spoke to no one, there was something not right with her. She seemed afraid. Finally I thought I needed another opinion, because I couldn’t let it go. I asked my friend Robin Foor to discreetly look at the Russian lady (I thought she was Russian), and tell me if he thought anything was amiss. We walked by where she was sitting, and Robin took a closer look at her. He didn’t think anything seemed wrong with her.
     Still uncomfortable about something I couldn’t name, I asked two young women students from our group to do the same. They did, and their answer was the same as Robin’s: nothing wrong. I continued wandering, trying to tell myself to let it go, it was none of my business. But I couldn’t. Finally a seat next to the mysterious lady became vacant. I went over and sat down. Then I knew. With no more movement than an occasional turn of her head to look about, this woman emanated fear. Seated next to her, I could feel it as surely as if she had been screaming. I became certain that she was terrified, but I didn’t know what to do. I was afraid that I, a husky 26-year-old male stranger, would further frighten or offend her, just by presuming to speak to her.
     So I sat next to her, feeling her fear continuously, and decided that I must do something, and do it as gently as possible. Finally, trying to seem casual and respectful, I turned and spoke to her in Russian: “Do you live in Moscow? We boarded the plane at the same....”
     Her words came in a cascade. She was Greek. Her son had married a Soviet woman. She spoke Greek and Russian, but could read or write no language. She had had throat surgery three or four days before. She had been trying to understand the polyglot announcements flowing around her in the airport, but couldn’t. She was lost in the multitude.
     I listened to her story at some length, stood, and told her I was going for help. A look of terror occupied her face. I was her only connection with humanity, and I was leaving. No, please....
     I promised her emphatically that I would return, with someone who could help her. I went to a ticket counter, walked up to a young woman working there, and asked her if she spoke Russian, English, Spanish or French, preferably one of the first three.
     “Yes sir, how may I help you?” her English was better than mine. I explained the Greek woman’s situation.
     “Take me to her.” She spoke in German to a colleague, nodded to me, and we threaded our way back through the crowd.
     That young woman was a blizzard of competence and caring. I asked her that we might proceed slowly, so I could get the languages right. She looked a long moment at the Greek woman, and knew the truth of what I had told her. She also understood me, probably better than I understood myself. With gentle, measured directness, she asked: Where is she going? I translated, trying to imitate the young Austrian’s manner. Athens. May I see her ticket? She read the ticket, nodded, smiled reassuringly. What surgery did she have? A tracheotomy to bypass a throat obstruction. What were the doctor’s instructions for post-operative care? Rest. Freedom from stress. Diet? Warm milk, eggs. Nothing else for several days, then gradual resumption of normal diet.
     That young Viennese angel took care of both of us. Mindful that both the Greek woman and I were working with Russian as a second language, and in a stressful situation, she parsed her words in short, clear English phrases, so I could do the same in Russian: Her flight has left. As the terror returned to the Greek woman’s face, the younger woman was ready: But there is another flight to Athens soon. She paused, studying the older woman’s face for acknowledgment, saw that acknowledgement soften her features after the quick surge of fear, continued: Tell her that I personally – she leaned in, communicating with her body and eyes so that the Greek woman could understand them, while making sure that I understood her words – I personally will guarantee that she is on that plane. Ask her for a phone number for her family in Athens. I will call them. I will ask them to meet the new flight. I will give them the flight number, the arrival time, the gate number. Tell her that now, right now, I will escort her to the infirmary downstairs, where she will be assigned a personal nurse. Tell her I will give her doctor’s instructions for care and diet to that nurse. Tell her that nurse will stay with her until she is on the plane. Tell her there is no staff member currently in the airport who speaks either Greek or Russian. But there is a staff member not here now who speaks Russian. Tell her that I will call that person, and she will come immediately here, and stay with her, and answer any questions, and get any help she needs, until she is on the plane. Tell her I will inform the plane’s crew of her situation. Tell her that a member of the crew will attend to her throughout the flight, and will walk with her off the plane in Athens, until she is in the arms of her family. Give her my personal guarantee of all this.
     I translated the young Viennese woman’s lucid phrases; she’d made it easy for me. We could see the fear slide off the older woman like a wet cloak.
     Somewhere in the disorganization of my storage shed, a few yards from my log cabin in Wallowa County, Oregon, is the letter (if the pack rats haven’t eaten it) in Russian from the Greek woman’s son, thanking me for helping his mother.
        
     It was mid-August, and we landed in Prague just as the city was seething with tension at the approach of the first anniversary of the Soviet military invasion on August 21, 1968. We’d started our day in Moscow, flown to Vienna, waited and milled around there for a few hours, and finally ended up in a Prague restaurant in time for a late dinner. We were hungry.
     Some of us started to ask questions in Russian, since the menu was in Czechoslovakian, which uses a Roman alphabet, and was confusing to us. Since Czechoslovakia was part of the Soviet blok, there should be no problem. I remember our waitress, a serious-looking young Czech, straightening her spine until she was an inch or two taller, and saying in loud, clear Russian: “Ladies and gentlemen, in this restaurant we do not speak Russian, ever!” She chose to use the pre-Soviet words for “ladies and gentlemen,” rather than the Soviet comrade or citizen.
     So we had to make do with the words we could transliterate, quietly, from the Czech words on the menu, back into Russian, then point to the item on the menu. I ordered rabbit, because I recognized the word and it was meat.
     The next morning in our hotel a young Czech man was telling some of us about the events of the year before. His friend had burst into his room and awakened him before dawn. “Hurry! Get dressed! The Russians are in Wenceslas Square! Soldiers, tanks....”
     They and everyone they knew rushed to the square, and formed a human wall in front of the tanks. Then, he said, one tank, or some tanks, opened fire with the machine guns on their turrets. He paused in his narrative and placed the tip of his right index finger in the middle of his forehead. “My friend was standing right next to me. He was shot. Here.”
     “Dead?”
     “Dead.”
     On the evening of the 19th some of us went to Wenceslas Square with the Czech students. Soviet soldiers in armored personnel carriers and on foot with submachine guns were there too. Czech citizens were shouting at them. We tried to understand what they were shouting – it sounded to some of us like “GES-TA-PO!” but we were never sure. Someone saw an old woman beating on one of the APCs with her cane. Finally the Soviets decided things were getting too unruly, and tear gassed our section of the crowd. Robin Foor remembers hearing gunfire. We ran from the tear gas – I remember being in some sort of underground passageway, which also had been gassed – and dispersed.
     There were other conversations with Czech students about their situation. I remember one in which a young man in our group asked the student who was speaking, “Why don’t you fight?”
     The speaker turned to him and spoke as if he were addressing a child, or an idiot: “Because..we..don’t..have..any..guns!”
     Since then, that remark, together with the events of those days, have formed the core of my opinion about gun control: while I don’t approve of a lot of yahoos running around with assault rifles just to prove... I don’t know what, I have believed since that day that no government, ever, must be allowed to have, or control, all the weapons in a society.

     Mariamna Soudakova had given me a special mission. There was a note with an address in Prague, and some help on how to find it. There was the name of a man to ask for. No one else. It might be difficult. Okay, it would be difficult. I would say certain words to this man. He would hand me a full-sized, traditional Russian samovar. It was very precious to her. I could not ship it; I must carry it, undamaged, in my own hands, and put it into hers.
     There was a subtext to Mara’s request. It wasn’t “Hey Dean, if you get a chance, stop by this address and pick up something for me, will you?” It went as far as this: I did something pretty big for you. Now you must do something big for me. It will be difficult. But you’re a few years older than the others, you’ve been around, you’ve been under the gun. This samovar is from my family. You’re the only one I trust with it. I won’t even tell you its story, but there is one, and it is worth the trouble. Do not fail me.

     We had been spending our time in the heart of the city. When I got off the tram in search of Mara’s samovar, I was in a totally different part of the city from the metropolitan bustle and boiling military presence at the city center. Here, though there were many apartment buildings – mostly newer – and some businesses, it was strangely quiet. Eerily quiet. The area didn’t seem deserted; I could feel the presence of people, a lot of them. I just couldn’t see them. Doors were closed, windows curtained.
     I knew I was somewhere near where I was supposed to be, according to Mara’s directions. But I needed help. I went into an apartment building I thought was near where I was supposed to be, and knocked on a door. No answer. Another door, another knock, no answer; and a couple more. I knew there were people here. Finally a door unlocked itself – two or three locks – and a human eyeball peered through the crack. I asked for the address, received a curt reply, and the eyeball disappeared and the door re-locked itself the same number of times. But the eyeball with a voice had given me a direction; I took it and knocked some more, asked some more. A new eyeball asked me whom I was looking for. I used both English and Russian, hoping to dilute the fear I felt all around me. I gave the man’s name, per Mara’s instructions, and the eyeball looked at me for a longer time. The crack widened. “What do you want?”
     “I’m an American student. My Russian teacher in the States gave me this name and this address, and asked me to pick up a samovar and deliver it to her in Colorado.”
     He opened the door, told me to come in quickly, stuck his head out and looked around just as quickly, and closed and locked it. “Wait here,” he said, after looking me over some more. He disappeared into another room.
     He came back with the samovar([7]), ill-concealed in a worn paper bag that wasn’t big enough to cover the top. He handed it to me. He seemed relieved to be rid of it, and now wanted to be rid of me. No small talk; no “So... how’ve your travels been?” - none of that. He marched to the door, unlocked it, and motioned for me to come close so he wouldn’t have to hold it open long. I did that, he opened the door, I stepped out, he closed and locked it behind me.
     We left Prague by train shortly before noon on August 20th; next day would be the anniversary of the invasion, the city was in turmoil, and everyone, it seemed, wanted us out of the city. I sat with the samovar on my lap to Munich, and a few days later on another train across fields of tulips in the Hook of Holland, then across the English Channel aboard a ferry, aboard the flight from London to New York, and a final flight from New York to St. Louis.
     There I took a taxi to the Greyhound station in St. Louis, which was, let us say, not in the snazziest part of town. I wanted out of there, but my bus wouldn’t leave until the next morning. I looked across the street. There was a hotel, of sorts. I went there, left my duffel in the room, wrapped the samovar in a shirt, and left with it in search of food. I left the key with the desk clerk, told him I just wanted to eat something, and wouldn’t be out late. I crossed the lobby and opened the door. “Hey!” I heard behind me.
     Over my shoulder, the clerk gave an easy nod to the left. “Go that way.” Then with a curt movement – more of a twitch – to the right, “Don’t go that way.”
     A couple of days later, pretty bedraggled, I knocked on the door of Mariamna Soudakova’s apartment, the ragged bundle in my arms. She opened the door, let me in, searched my face with her eyes. I handed her the bundle. She turned and walked to her dining table, set it down, unwrapped it, picked it up and turned it in her hands and looked it over. All over.
     She turned to me, searched my face again. “Thank you, Dean,” she said. She had expected no less.


[1] This was a partial reprise of the sailors’ mutiny aboard the battleship Potëmkin in 1905. In both cases, conditions for ordinary sailors were so severe, and the exercise of authority by officers so arbitrary and cruel, that rebellion was all but inevitable.
[2] The same day the mass executions of Jews began at Babii Yar, a ravine outside Kiev,650 miles to the south.
[3] St. Petersburg was the name of the city before the Soviets renamed it Leningrad; it took the name back after the fall of the Soviet Union.
[4] There are first person accounts of the executions in Babii Yar in Klee, et.al., “The Good Old Days, pp.63ff. The killing was organized so that the corpses formed layers in the ravine. When their turn came, the required number of Jews would be marched around a bend that had shielded them from seeing the execution site. They would be lined up on the rim of the ravine, machine gunned, and tumble down onto the previous layer, now covered by a thin layer of earth. Junior officers then walked on and among the corpses, executing with their pistols at close range anyone still alive. The primary concern of those cited seemed to be the psychological effects of the repeated “blowback” – bits of skull and brain – on the shooters.
[6] Throughout the Vietnam War, particularly in its later years, rumors would circulate about both Soviet and Chinese advisors being spotted, killed and/or captured while serving with North Vietnamese units in South Vietnam. Of course.
[7] A usually ornate (Mara’s was) metallic vessel (hers was silver or nickel) used in Russia, and some other countries, to heat water for tea, and then to keep the tea hot.

A COLLEGE ROOMMATE, AND ABRAHAM AND ISAAC, AND VIETNAM

                                                               Mark
     Four of us vets rented a house a few blocks east of campus on Cache la Poudre. Mike Taylor, who had been raised partly in Europe, thought the place needed a little something, so he unfurled a three‑foot by twenty‑some‑foot banner he'd been saving for a special occasion, and we hung it across the front of the house. It had a big yellow Shell Oil emblem and the words "C'est SHELL que j'aime." Basically, "I love Shell." The neighbors were afraid it signified some kind of cult, but we didn't care. We liked the notoriety.
     So the place became known around campus as "the Shell house." Mark Streuli wasn't living there at the time because there weren't enough rooms. But he was one of us. Of the five of us, Mark and I had been in the military in Vietnam, and Jim and I had spent the summer of ’68 there as journalists.
     Mark had been in Army Special Forces in Viet Nam. He was a quiet, wiry, intense man who seemed to have a bemused attitude toward the political passions and idealisms of the rest of us. He is the only man I've ever heard refer to combat as a game, and he was serious. I, ever the idealist, had angry words with him at the time; later I came to believe he’d been more right than I had wanted to believe.


     When Jim and I had returned from our trip to Southeast Asia in the fall of 1968 and began telling our stories to our roommates, Mark was astonished to hear that I'd spent a week at Mangbuk. "I built that place!" exclaimed this man who prided himself on not getting visibly excited. He went on to qualify himself, saying that he had supervised the initial construction of the camp at Mangbuk during his time as a demolitions specialist and combat engineer with the Special Forces.    
     Once in a while when Mark was over and the five of us, plus whatever visitors had happened by during the evening, stayed up late partying or just talking half the night around the kitchen table, Mark would crash at the Shell house instead of walking back to his rented room half a mile away.
     One morning I got up when the rest of the house was still in bed to find Mark asleep on the floor in the hall outside the door to my room. Mark was one of those vets you didn't startle awake because you didn't know what he might have been dreaming, and he had the reflexes and training to react and do some real damage before he became fully awake.


     I stepped over him as carefully and quietly as I could. I watched his face so I could speak if he started awake. What I saw instead was a barely perceptible change in his breathing, then an ever‑so‑slight lifting of one eyelid. He was awakening the way we had learned to when we were in the boonies: you let your mind and then your senses come awake without giving any outward sign of it in case someone is trying to slip up and kill you. You let your mind remember where you are. You mentally locate your hands and feet; you remember whether you are wearing boots. You remember where your weapons are in relation to your hands. You listen for movement around you. You crack open an eyelid just enough to see out between the lashes but not enough to seem awake. You check out the area. If everything you see and hear is normal, then you can open your eyes.    
     I knew Mark was now awake, watching me between the lashes of one slightly opened eye.
     "Mornin', Mark," I said.     
     He grunted and went back to sleep.

                                 J. Glenn Gray and Kierkegaard and Abraham and Isaac
     In our last semester before graduation in the Spring of 1969, a small group of philosophy majors met at Professor Gray's house for a seminar in Modern European Philosophy. We met there because Gray had been recovering for some time from a serious heart attack. Some of us were going on to graduate study in philosophy. Jim Martin was in the class too, because although he was a political science major, he'd taken enough philosophy courses, and taken them seriously enough, that Gray welcomed him into the seminar. Jim later married Gray's daughter Sherry.


     J. Glenn Gray was an icon on campus, and indeed in the national community of students, teachers, and writers of philosophy. His best‑known book, The Warriors: Reflections on Men in Battle, about his experiences as an intelligence officer in Europe in WWII, has such a word‑of‑mouth reputation that it keeps slipping back into print, though it was first published in 1959.
     We did readings in Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Heidegger, and Karl Jaspers; and maybe one or two others. Gray had spent considerable time with Martin Heidegger, and had translated his Was Heisst Denken? as What Is Called Thinking?, which was on our reading list.
     He assigned me a paper on Kierkegaard's dialectic of faith, partly because Gray knew of my interest in Hegelian dialectics, which I'd studied with Professor Harvey Rabbin (who also attended this seminar along with Gray, and helped teach it, because of Gray’s weakened condition). Gray’s doctoral thesis, Hegel and the Greeks, continued to be reprinted in paperback for many years after its initial publication. Kierkegaard's essay which I was to write about was “Fear and Trembling”. It dealt with the biblical story of Abraham and Isaac. I remember Professor Gray using the word "sublime" to describe Abraham's faith, which was so deep that he was willing to sacrifice his son, Isaac, for his God.
     Sublime? I was furious. I read Kierkegaard's essay. It in no way abated my fury. My assignment was to make a copy of my paper for each student in the seminar, and one each for Gray and Rabbin. I did so, with this title at the top of each mimeographed copy: "Kierkegaard's Dialectic of Faith: Or, How to Eat Shit and Like It."


     When we gathered for the class, I had the butterflies, as if I were about to start in my first high‑school football game, or, for that matter, about to enter a firefight. Professor Gray passed around the copies of my paper. It wasn't hard to see that this man, whom we all revered for his wisdom and fairness and his thoroughly warm and gentle nature, was angry. When each person in the circle of fewer than ten people had received a copy of my paper, he spoke, with a sternness that I, at least, had never before seen in him: "The first thing I want everyone to do is to take Dean's paper and cross out the title." His face was in profile to me as he said it (I was to his left); he seemed to be speaking to everyone but me. Then he turned his beloved, stern, disapproving, wounded old man's face to me and, barely meeting my eyes, mumbled words to the effect that, no matter what our opinions were, and no matter how strongly held, there was absolutely no excuse for using that kind of language in this class.
     Everyone except me took out a pen and bent over the paper, pressed on the floor or a book or a clipboard, and crossed out the title of my paper. The room seemed soaked in pain. Professor Gray said I could go ahead and present my paper.


     I was as angry as he was, and as committed to my state of mind as he was to his. Here I have to say that I feel now([1]) as I felt then, and I think now as I thought then. But what I remember after Professor Gray told people to cross out my title is jumbled. I know that I made my case, and that I so strongly felt myself to be right that I was willing to risk censure, even total ostracism, from these few people whose opinions of me, along with those of my roommates, meant more to me than those of anyone else in the world. Well. Except for the Marines I’d served with. But they were scattered about the world, and these people were here, in Dr. Gray’s living room.
     I’m sure I spoke in an overwrought, choke‑throated, stumbling, almost tearfully pleading sort of way. However well or ill I made my case then, these were its elements:
     I have seen, and been a party to, the killing of men, women, children. I have walked through people's homes with a bayonet fixed on the end of my automatic rifle, and have used it to guard those people while my comrades burned their homes. That is obscenity. The use of the word "shit" is not only trifling by comparison; it is at times the only accurate word to describe the reality before us. It is among the few words we have in the American language to signify the obscenity which I witnessed and perpetrated. I came here, to the study of philosophy and to this class, to attempt to understand, and then in some small way to rectify, what I have done, what other men have done before me, what still other men are doing now, as we speak, and will do in the future. I take this work, and my expression of it, most seriously. I cannot do this work without the uncompromising use of the clearest language I can call to mind. That is what I did here. I did it from a sense of mortal and moral urgency, and in good faith. I insist that my sincerity, and my accuracy, be recognized.


     Your sense of propriety is a significant part of a mental construct which is the very reason why we do, have done, and will do the murderous things that we do.
     You asked me to write about faith. I know something about faith. I was willing to die to keep the faith, and nearly did. Whether or not you agree with me, that gives me the right to speak and write as I do, and to demand that you listen. I was among the very most faithful. Our motto, as Marines, was Semper Fidelis, Always Faithful. We did not question this, as Abraham did not question his God. We had a more popular, more vulgar version: Ours is not to reason why; ours is but to do or die.
     You must, you absolutely must, hear me now, on this subject; or, even if I must stand alone against you, Professor Gray, and against the rest of you, my friends whom I love, I will judge your efforts at philosophy as being insincere, irrelevant, and fundamentally and humanly dishonest. What I am saying to you is that, as a faithful soldier, I was Isaac; and as a small unit leader in combat situations, I was also his father, Abraham. Younger men than I, boys really, trusted me when I ordered them into the fight, trusted that the reasons for my orders to them justified their sacrifice. That sacrifice was, or easily could have been, so great that for you to express anger or displeasure at my use of a word most of the world uses anyway, which all kids learn on childhood playgrounds, is for you to break the deeper faith, the one that springs from our common humanity.


     Goddamn you, listen: it's no accident that they call us "infantry." We are the manchildren who, now and forever back in time, provide the sinew of armies, provide the blood and decomposing tissue the death of which, in most wars in most times, serves no purpose more noble than the fertilization of the soil on which we die, which could have been accomplished by the spreading of manure, or of bone meal or some other by‑product of the slaughterhouses from which we get the steaks and chops we barbecue on patriotic three‑day weekends.
     We are too young to judge the rightness or wrongness, or the odds of success or failure, of the demands which send us, first to the recruiter, then to boot camp, then to armies, then to war, then to some bullshit little roadway or village or bridge or snowy hillock on the wrong side of the world, to slaughter, and be slaughtered by, human beings who are more like us than we are like the leaders who sent us into the fight.
     It is only by luck, by a mathematically serendipitous circumstance that had me standing in a certain randomly chosen place instead of a few inches to the right or left when the bullets came past my ear at Tho An, that I am alive, and here, to say this to you.


     What I survived to say to you is that faith is not enough. Faith, by its very nature, does not question. So the faithful soldier does not know whether the government he fights to save is really democratic, or even whether that government truly asked for his help. He doesn't know whether the soldiers he fights against represent a truly evil cause, or are just simple, faithful, unquestioning "INFANTry" like himself. He doesn't know whether inaccuracies in the information which is the basis of his marching orders result from faulty intelligence or from lies. Often it comes from both, as was the case in the Gulf of Tonkin, and more recently in the run-up to the current war in Iraq.
     Goddamn it, listen: Abraham's responsibility is not to his God, but to his son. For if he chooses his God over his son, then he will forever be sacrificing his own blood and that of his children for the sake of schemes hatched by men in long black robes, or odd‑shaped hats, or colored sashes. I bring this to you direct from the well in the village of Tho An, where the difference between what I was doing and what I had been told first appeared to me in such startling clarity.

     However well or clumsily that is expressed, what I said to J. Glenn Gray and Harvey Rabbin and my fellow students that Spring evening in 1969 was much clumsier. It was no less deeply felt.
     It didn't cut much ice. Gray was stern toward me the rest of the evening.
     Now, as I go back through his wonderfully thoughtful book, The Warriors: Reflections on Men in Battle, I see again his reaching, with all sincerity and with carefully reasoned and stated reservations, for religion as the sole possibility for limiting the violence which we humans visit on one another in wars.


     I still can't agree. Religion was more effective in supporting the pointless carnage of Vietnam, and in the preparation of us faithful young warriors to fight there, than in stopping it. I still think that, of the human impulses, religion, far from being a way out of the violence, has the bloodiest hands of all.
     Gray and I stayed friends, but never really returned to the conversation which had been so painful for me, and I think for him as well. He wrote glowing letters for me, which helped get me admitted to the History of Consciousness Ph.D. program at the University of California, Santa Cruz, whence Harvey Rabbin had come. They certainly also contributed to my receiving a Woodrow Wilson Fellowship, and a full scholarship my first year of graduate school.
     Each of us had been as sincere, and as certain, as the other. I think that the difference between us regarding faith showed, more starkly than anything else, the difference between what the soldiers of his war experienced and what the soldiers of my war experienced.
     I think that Professor Gray was, in his bones, too kind, too decent a man to truly understand the murderousness to which he sometimes put his mind and pen. I mean this only as concerns the role of faith in human affairs, when it comes to the institutional killing done by the world’s armies. I thought so then; I think so now. Thanks to the aggregate of Vietnam, my studies (including 3 years of philosophy courses from Dr. Gray), my reading, my experiences as a journalist in other wars, and to the limitations of my own character, I no longer have that problem.


[1] “Now” in this case is March 24, 2009, as I write and edit  the final pages of this book.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

SPOOK-HUNTING IN LAOS


                                        Spook‑hunting in Laos
NOTE: A much shorter (and partially censored) version of this chapter was first published in the Colorado College Magazine, Spring 1969.

     Julian Manyon and I met along the journalism trail in Vietnam during that summer of 1968. He was intelligent, fluent in French, and spindly to the point of frailty. Sometime during our travels together, he had his 16th birthday. He'd been brought up in British "public" schools, which were really private, and had never been interested in sports or other such crude physical endeavors. He seemed so out of place that I greatly admired his nerve for coming to Vietnam at all, and he had traveled overland all the way from Russia, except for flights from Calcutta to Bangkok, and Bangkok to Saigon.
     Once in a restaurant I noticed that the waitress, a Vietnamese woman in her thirties, kept looking quizzically at Julian. Finally her curiosity won out; she asked me if he was ong, man; or ba, woman.

     He later caused me some jealousy when he showed up with a dazzlingly pretty young woman. Her mother was Vietnamese and her father had been a Japanese soldier during their occupation of Indochina during WWII. She was a stewardess for Air Viet Nam. She was also a Viet Cong agent. Their mutual trust had grown to the point that she'd confided in him. He had in turn insisted on telling me, and had done so before he introduced us. The visible struggle between fear and resolve in her eyes and body language as we stood and talked left no doubt as to the truth of the story, or to her nervousness at being in the presence of a stranger who knew her secret.
     Manyon and I both had become interested in rumors floating among the Saigon press corps about a secret CIA airline operating in Laos. We were also interested in how the war was affecting Laos and Cambodia, both supposedly neutral. We checked and found that Prince Sihanouk strictly prohibited Western journalists from entering Cambodia. We went to the Australian embassy where Julian, a British subject, was able to wrangle student visas for both of us.                                   
   We traveled as cheaply as we could, leaving Phnom Penh on a large riverboat which went downstream from the city on the Tonle Sap River, then turned upstream on the Mekong. We traveled all night on the boat, pulling in several times to way stations along the bank. That night entered my dreams, so that my memory of it is built of both dream and recollection, a phantasmagorical montage of steep earthen cliffs, eroded into a brown corduroy which seemed to pulsate in the light of torches carried by children who scurried up the plank with baskets of hot corn‑on‑the‑cob, skewered meat, sliced mango and pineapple, and short, stubby bananas.

     Manyon and I got along pretty well, but were a ways from being soul‑mates. I was astonished at his physical weakness, and, in my typically intolerant fashion, more than a little put out by having to help him hoist his pack to the top of a bus, or even to push him up over the side rails and into the back of a truck. Ours was a pragmatic arrangement: I had a strong back and military experience; he spoke French.
     Kracheh was the end of the line for the riverboat; from there we took a series of rural buses, and hitched the odd ride with truck drivers. That got us as far as Stung Treng, the last sizeable town in northern Cambodia. From there, we hitched a ride with two merchants in their jeeps to the Laotian border.
     Pakse was our first Laotian town. It lay on the east bank of the Mekong at the end of a hectic four‑hour ride in a tiny bus over a road periodically interdicted by bridges which had been hastily blown by the Pathet Lao (cousins‑to‑the‑west of the Viet Cong) and just as hastily repaired by government road gangs spending money furnished them by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

     I remember Pakse for a couple of reasons, the first of which was a very good, if not overly clean, Chinese restaurant where Manyon and I stuffed ourselves on sweet‑and‑sour pork, shrimp, steamed rice, fried rice, salad, and beer for less than a dollar each. We talked about Chinese expatriots around the world, how there is a remarkable consistency about the way they move into a place with hardly a possession, and manage to set up some kind of business by means of which they transform wretchedness into dignity. Often when success comes to them, it is at the expense of the less ambitious Vietnamese or Cambodians or Laotians around them, so they form islands of Chinese society in indifferent or hostile seas; they draw into themselves, endure the envious stares of the locals, and await a friendlier day. As we spoke of this, I remembered Nicholas Lawrence Lieuw, a Chinese Catholic from Kotakinabalu, Borneo, and how he had been able to converse in Mandarin with the restaurateurs in Phnom Penh, and how that was the only time I saw a spark of emotion in the one old man's face ‑ the one who ran the restaurant at the Hotel Mondial ‑ during the time I was in that city. He and the other waiters in the place seemed to get along with the Cambodians, but it was more like respectful tolerance of customers than real warmth.
     In Kotakinabalu, Lieuw worked as a travel agent. He was on an extended Asian vacation, a benefit of his job. His main interest seemed to be to sample the women in the brothels of each city he visited.

     For Manyon and me, Pakse was the location of our first contacts with the American and Royal Laotian Government establishments. We began looking for evidence of secret air operations. If American pilots actually were conducting military operations, this would be a violation of the 1962 Geneva accords on Laos, which stipulated that Laotian soil be neutral, and that the presence of foreign military personnel was prohibited. The U.S. was a signatory. Of course, the thousands of North Vietnamese troops infiltrating through Laos into South Vietnam via the Ho Chi Minh trail would be illegal as well.

     From the beginning, our trip through Laos was a series of experiences which were so contradictory that we began to get a feeling of other‑worldliness about the place and about the war that was supposedly going on there. We had as yet seen nothing to confirm the presence of an actual shooting war, except for the blown‑and-repaired  bridges we had crossed and the well‑guarded checkpoints we had passed through on the road up from Cambodia. One afternoon Manyon had a long talk with an old Laotian doctor in Pakse. He asked the doctor if there was really any fighting going on in the country, and was informed that there was at that moment a fierce battle in progress at Saravane, about fifty air miles northeast of Pakse toward where the Ho Chi Minh Trail snaked through the eastern part of the country on its way into the northern provinces of South Vietnam. Apparently the RLG (Royal Laotian Government) garrison was completely surrounded and in imminent danger of being overrun. The doctor also said that there were many American aircraft, including fighters, flying in and out of the place. He said that some of the airplanes were marked "Air America," an ostensibly civilian aviation company contracted to USAID in Vietnam and Laos which some Americans in that part of the world admitted off the record to be a CIA front.

     We had heard that there was an airstrip outside Pakse where such flights might be originating, so we took a shuttle taxi out the highway and got off at the first of two gates to the airfield. We knew that the hangars and office buildings were near the other gate, but wanted an excuse to wander along the airstrip and take a look at some of the hardware of the Royal Laotian Air Force and its American "civilian" benefactors.
     The Laotian fighters were T‑28's, an earlier model of the A‑1 Skyraider with which the U.S. had outfitted the South Vietnamese Air Force. Some were marked with the three‑headed elephant (actually four, when seen in three dimensions) which was the seal of the government, and some were unmarked. There were only a few American aircraft around; most were C‑123 cargo planes used widely by the U.S. Air Force and Marine Corps in Vietnam. It is originally a military aircraft; the ones we saw in Laos were all plain silver and identified only by the words "Air America" stencilled in very small black letters under the wings, and by equally small black numbers on their tails.

     No one accosted us before we got to the hangar area, so we looked around for some Americans to talk to, and encountered another strange phenomenon of the "forgotten war": the Americans received us with a coolness which bordered on hostility, which seemed to deepen as they noticed our ages, as they found out that we were college students, and particularly when we told them we were journalists. It is customary for countrymen who cross paths in out‑of‑the‑way places to greet one another at least civilly, but this almost never happened to us in Laos. It was a strange feeling, after spending several days without seeing a Caucasian, to pass on the street some clean‑cut type in civilian clothes, of stern demeanor, who is obviously an American, who just as obviously recognizes you as being an American, and who then averts his glance and passes without a nod.      
     In the office building there were a switchboard operator and a couple of pilots in civilian clothes who were about to leave for the day. They were carrying flight helmets and flak jackets, and were not particularly anxious to sit and chat with us. We asked them if they had any aircraft going out to the area of Saravane where the fighting was going on, and if so, could we catch a ride?
     The answers were short and polite: Air America didn't carry unauthorized passengers; besides, there were no aircraft going out to the area of Saravane because nothing was happening there. There hadn't been any fighting anywhere around for months because of the rainy season. (We knew better: that was when VC and NVA mounted many attacks because it limited the effectiveness and range of their enemies' air support).
     We walked back along the flight line toward the gate where we had entered. Since we were unsatisfied with the information we had been given, Manyon and I decided to see if the Americans at Pakse were as much on the up‑and‑up as they would have had us believe. If they weren't doing anything to be touchy about, they shouldn't mind if we took a few pictures of their little ol' unmarked airplanes....

     The jeep caught us at the far end of the flight line. There was a Laotian Brigadier General in the passenger seat and a U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel, in full dress green uniform, in the back seat. The driver pulled up alongside us and skidded the jeep to a stop. The colonel was excited.
     "Hey, who the hell are you?" he yelled from the back seat.
     "Oh, hello, Colonel. We're student journalists. He's British, and I'm American. We were just...."
     "I saw what you were doing. You were taking pictures, weren't you?"
     "Yeah. What's wrong with that?"
     The guy couldn't believe his eyes and ears. I had on a pair of faded, dirty Levi's, an old cowboy shirt with the sleeves rolled up, and a few days' growth of beard; Manyon looked like a London street urchin. And we called ourselves journalists.
     "Well, there's nothing secret about them or anything, but you're just not supposed to take pictures on the flight line, any flight line. It's just military security. You guys got any identification?"

     We showed him our press credentials from Saigon, which he did not recognize, but which were obviously legitimate. He cooled off a little. We acted dumb, and that fools most American army officers, including this one. He showed our press cards to the general and spoke to him in Lao. Then he asked us just what sort of story we were after, and we replied that we had thought it would be interesting to do a feature story on the Royal Laotian Air Force for the students back home who seldom get to hear about this sort of thing, and did he have any suggestions?
     "I think you'd better go see the head of USAID," he said. "This is highly irregular."
     He spoke again to the general and the general got out of the jeep and the colonel climbed out and let us into the back seat and then got into the general's seat, and we drove off leaving the general standing at the end of the flight line.
     The two secretaries at the USAID office were American girls about my age, fine‑looking to two of us just in from the wilderness, but about as friendly as the colonel and the pilots had been. They gave us coffee and we waited for the official who was the local head of USAID.

     When he came in we could tell that the colonel had spoken to him at some length about us, because he looked us up and down carefully, and because he already knew all about the business at the airstrip. But we did the harmless act again and started asking about rural development and about how the new IR‑8 and IR‑5([1]) rice strains were doing in Laos, and he loosened up somewhat and began to answer questions. We got around to asking him if there were any way he could help us with transportation as we went about our research, and he got careful again and said that we'd have to go to Vientiane, the capital, and talk to the press officer at the embassy there. He emphasized that this was a requirement, not a request; and that the press officer would be expecting us.
     It was about noon when we got our packs from the hotel room. (This is how we lived in Laos: a cheap hotel room would be 600 or 700 kips ‑ at 500 to the dollar ‑ so since Manyon had more money than I, he'd pay 500 and sleep on the bed, and I'd pay 200 and sleep on the floor. He hated discomfort; I was more worried about food.) We took a taxi out of town a ways and caught a ride on a rice truck.
     It was a jolly ride, sitting atop the load of rice bags as we passed primitive frontier outposts where a soldier and his family, living in a pole shack at the end of a bridge, would be its only security. Several of the bridges were recently blown, and we'd have to leave the road and drive through the woods until we came to a ford. It was all the same to the driver; he'd bounce along through the trees until he got back on the main road, then drive like hell for the next crossing.
     The mood of the countryside began to change. There were more outposts, with more barbed wire and revetments, and more soldiers with weapons more in evidence.
Toward evening one of the truck's tires blew out, and we all piled out while I helped the driver change tires. The driver and the other two Laotians in the cab reminded me of the truckers I'd worked with in Colorado Springs the summer before, the way they sweated and cursed and laughed as we were changing the tire.
     Soon after that we stopped for a meal in a roadside village. The open‑front, weathered board building where we ate must have been the Laotian equivalent of a truck stop. The women who worked there seemed to be three generations of the same family. They looked at Manyon and me with some curiosity, but when we smiled and said "merci" and made the traditional gesture of hands together under the chin, bowing slightly, they became open and very friendly. We had some strips of boiled meat – maybe pork ‑ and some foul‑smelling soup with animal parts floating in it, and the glutinous rice they always had that you grabbed a handful of and rolled into a sticky ball and ate like a candy bar. In fact, you ate everything with your hands except the soup.      
     Julian Manyon would have none of it. He was quite sure that his digestive system couldn't handle such strange food. In fact, there were many times during the trip when I had to laugh at how utterly out of place he was in a primitive situation. There were even a couple of times ‑ like when we were with the army outside Thakkek ‑ when I would roundly curse him for it.     

     I offered ‑ not too insistently ‑ to help pay for the meal, but the driver wouldn't accept. I think he'd been pleased by my helping with the tire change, and then when we'd finished and were all thirsty, I'd broken out two canteens of water and passed them around. Also, he could see that we weren't rich tourists, and he didn't feel compelled to make a profit from hauling us. In fact, this was something we were to notice several times ‑ the business of paying what you could afford. On the little bus that had brought us into Pakse from the south, there was a wrinkled old man who had walked out of the jungle and stood at the edge of the road to wait for the bus, and when the boy who was collecting fares came in front of him, the old man pulled from his pocket a 100‑kip note that was even more wrinkled than his face, and the boy refused it. The old man made the appropriate gesture to save his dignity, then finally the boy took the bill from his hand and shoved it emphatically back into the old man's shirt pocket. We got the feeling that this scene was re‑enacted every time the old man got on the bus, with the same 100-kip note. I also got a break on the fare that time. And weeks later in Cambodia, as I was taking the river boat back downstream to Phnom Penh, one of the passengers bought me a meal of fried rice from the little kitchen on the boat's fantail. Without it, I'd not have eaten.

     The tire change had taken more than an hour, and as we got on the road again, the sun was going down. With the coming of darkness, the mood of the Laotians changed. They no longer laughed or talked or pointed off to the sides of the road; they just sat there, and the driver pushed the truck as fast as it would go. There would be some conversation now between the driver and the guards at each checkpoint, and when we started up again he'd get the truck back up to top speed right away. Apparently it wasn't a good idea to be on the road at night in that part of the country. Manyon and I joked nervously about the possibility of his convincing the Pathet Lao that we were Frenchmen.
     But points of light began to wink more often from the side of the road, and the truck slowed as the driver and his friends relaxed and began to talk again. We were pulling into the outskirts of Savannakhet.
     There was a military barricade at the town limits, a curfew after which no autos were permitted to enter town, and we were late. Manyon and I got down from the truck and went over to a roadside cafe where one of the truck drivers was still standing around. As we approached he was saying something about us to the mother of the family who ran the cafe, and it must have been favorable, because the driver hadn't asked us for any money. It was customary for truckers to earn extra money hauling passengers because there were so few buses.

     The eldest son of the family came up and said in English that he had a motorcycle, which was allowed past the barricades, and that he would be glad to take Manyon and me, one at a time, into town. He said that it was 4 or 5 kilometers, and that he knew where the hotel was. We thanked him and decided that Manyon should go first. As they started off I walked over to one of the little metal‑topped tables and sat down. The mother and her teen‑age daughter and younger son all sat down around me, and they were very friendly. At first I was suspicious; I had been conditioned to be that way in Vietnam, where Americans got used to overtures being made with monetary return, or something more sinister, in mind.
     But these Laotians were genuinely warm people, and soon began to disarm me. The boy, who was about ten years old, had had some English in school, and we tried for a while to carry on a conversation. I asked him how many Americans there were in the area, and he said that there were quite a few, more than at Pakse. After a while he asked if I would like anything to drink, and I said no. The mother spoke to her daughter, who got up and brought me a glass of tea anyway. I reached for some money, but they wouldn't accept it, even though the place was a restaurant. Then the mother motioned for the girl to come and sit closer to me. I finally forced myself to relax and admit that they didn't want anything. It was one of the most subtly painful experiences I was to have all summer, for it became a tactic of survival for an American in Southeast Asia to distrust, as a potential enemy or opportunist, anyone he didn't know. The strength of the habit became cruelly apparent when I found myself acting coldly towards people who truly wanted to befriend me.      
     The older son returned, and I thanked his family and got on the motorcycle behind him. He took me to the hotel in town where Manyon was waiting. There was a strong odor of marijuana smoke as I entered the lobby; the stuff was legal in Laos.

     We were up early and caught the bus to Thakkek, where we arrived at about noon, changed buses, and continued on. A few miles northwest of town there was a large steel bridge on which the Pathet Lao had done a beautiful job, dropping a full span of it into the river. The river was too deep to ford, so a ferry had been set up to carry vehicular traffic, including our bus, across. It was mid‑afternoon when we got to Paksane, where we looked up and saw a giant silver Boeing 707 tanker refueling one of a flight of four sleek fighters. I remember them because they looked so out of place over that town, a lovely little hick place that reminded me of Powell Butte, Oregon.
     We had some bad luck at Paksane. The driver knew people there, and he sat in one of the cafes drinking lemonade and talking so long that he was conveniently able to decide that we'd never make Vientiane before the curfew, and would have to spend the night where we were. He drove the bus to a hotel where people who could afford it took rooms; Manyon and I slept in the bus with the other peasants.

     The next day we were in Vientiane by noon. We went to the American Embassy and looked up the press officer, whose name was Phil Wilcox. The first thing he said was "Oh, yes, I've been expecting you two." The USAID man had called him from Pakse, and he already had the story about our photography excursion along the airstrip there. And by the time we got to Vientiane, we had been hitchhiking for several days while living out of our rucksacks, and looked it. Wilcox's quizzical expression as he looked us over seemed to ask the same two questions which by now we were used to: were we for real, and if so, were we a threat to his enterprise?
     He began questioning us, and when he asked what publications we were writing for, I pulled out the article I'd had published in the Denver Post. That broke the ice; it turned out that his father‑in‑law was one of the editors. In fact, his brother-in-law, Chuck Buxton, was editor of the Colorado College Tiger, and I also had a credential from him.  We talked about Colorado, and then, as he had decided to help us, about the vast differences in journalistic activity between Vietnam and Laos. Manyon and I complained about how difficult it was even to talk to Americans in Laos, much less to get transportation assistance or information concerning the policies and projects of the American mission in Laos.
     In spite of his offer of help, Wilcox again became defensive. He explained that since there was a full‑fledged war going on in Vietnam, the American military establishment there had huge appropriations for such things as accommodating reporters, but there weren't any of our military personnel in Laos at all, and the civilian budget, he said, was pitiful. (It was another stanza of the same song we were to hear from American and Laotian functionaries alike: nobody cares what happens in Laos, the same people who are contributing so much to the war effort in Vietnam don't even care that there are 40,000 regular North Vietnamese troops right there in Laos, Congress wouldn't give them weapons or airplanes or money... it was "the forgotten war."

     Wilcox was careful to ascribe the limited nature of his offer of help (he would give us names of people to see, and try to get us aboard an Air America plane to Savannakhet if there were any extra seats) to limited resources. He skillfully parried our questions intimating that the reason journalists weren't welcome aboard Air America planes, or even, it seemed, in front areas in general, might be because something was going on there which the public wasn't supposed to hear. He would shrug off such queries, saying that we already knew that there was no American military effort in Laos ‑ after all, that was strictly forbidden by the 1962 Geneva Accords - and we should know how much it hurt when the Americans had to stand by helplessly and see their Laotian friends get overrun by superior numbers.
     We didn't press further because we needed his help. He gave us press passes to the airport where the three American pilots were to be flown in from Hanoi the following night (Friday, August 2, 1968), and told us how to get in touch with General Oudone Sananikone, who was Chief of Staff and Information Officer for the Royal Laotian Army.

     A hard core of reporters had been making the round trip from Saigon to Vientiane and back for as many as four weekends in a row by the time Manyon and I had arrived after a haphazard journey of six days, which covered some seven hundred miles by just about every means of transportation imaginable except flying. When the newly released pilots conveniently deplaned less than thirty‑six hours after our arrival, some of the Saigon‑based journalists were envious of our luck.
     It was a disgusting experience, made more disgusting by the fact that what happened really surprised no one who was present.
     The International Control Commission aircraft (a C‑47, I believe) taxied onto an apron near the terminal building at about 10:30p.m., local time. Ambassador Sullivan, dressed in a tropical suit and tie, climbed the portable stairway into the plane. We were expecting a wait (there were 30 or 40 reporters present), and we got it. The cordon of Laotian police allowed us to pour through the gate and form a large half‑circle with its center at the tail exit of the aircraft.
     After a time some men ‑ possibly members of the Commission ‑ began to straggle to the exit and down the ladder, disappearing behind the ring of reporters and American Embassy personnel. Once in a while we would see a stewardess appear silhouetted in the doorway, then disappear again inside. Two or three times the policemen fell back and let us reduce the size of the ring. The still photographers were talking about shutter speeds, and the television cameramen set up their floodlights to create a small area of intense whiteness in the surrounding dark.

     Finally Sullivan came down the ladder and strode to the center of the ring of waiting newsmen. He made a terse statement that Major so‑and‑so, as senior man, would speak for the three pilots, and that we should keep our questions brief. Then he left.
     Then, after about a forty‑minute wait, the pilots came out. All were wearing white shirts, open at the neck, and not‑too‑convincing smiles.
     "How's it feel to be back, Major?" was the profound first question.
     "Oh, great, just great, really good to be back...." Toothy smile followed. Somebody had given the major a big cigar, and he lit up and puffed happily. When he was asked how they had been treated in prison; he answered, "Very well. The North Vietnamese treated us very well."   
     He was already beginning to sound like a tape recorder.

     There were more questions: about how long each of them had been imprisoned, whether they'd heard from their families, when they'd found out they were to be released... and there was the question of how the three would return to the United States, to which the major answered that they had been given the choice of going by commercial aircraft or a special Air Force jet, and "hadn't decided yet." The questions were mostly of the unphilosophical, home‑town news release type, and several of us were getting the impression that the major preferred them that way. As the queries got closer to sensitive territory ‑ what kinds of missions they'd been on, what they felt about the damage they'd caused ‑ the major began to hedge, and indicated that it was time to cut the thing short; they were very tired and wanted to get home to their wives.
     Manyon's question was the capper: "Major, have your personal views changed any as a result of your missions over North Vietnam and your subsequent imprisonment?"
     "Well, since you don't know what my views were before, I guess you can't tell, can you? Ha, ha."
     Again, there was the toothy smile and a flourish of the cigar as the three pilots began to ease their way through the crowd of reporters. Someone muttered that Ambassador Sullivan had done a pretty good coaching job.
     The next day we were in General Oudone Sananikone's office asking for help. He was a thoroughly pleasant chap, as indeed were all the Laotian officers we met. We repeatedly got the impression that while they all realized they had a war to fight, they saw no sense in getting up tight about it. In fact the regional commander at Savannakhet told us a couple of days later that the massive sweep toward the Ho Chi Minh trail which Manyon and I were supposed to accompany had been postponed due to insufficiency of ammunition; then he shrugged and reiterated the already familiar complaint about la guerre oubliée, the forgotten war. By the time I left Laos, the military establishment there was to remind me several times of characters in Steinbeck's novel Tortilla Flat: not real go-getters.

     There were two other reporters in the general's office for a briefing; we were invited to sit in. One was a beefy Australian who wrote for the London Daily Mirror; I think the other was an American. We stood around in front of a large wall map as the general pointed out unit locations and sketched their situations, and once again we were swamped with descriptions and statistics concerning the activities and military superiority of the North Vietnamese forces in Laos, and how Laos was really the key to the whole Southeast Asian question, but the Americans refused to recognize the fact and give them airplanes and rifles and money to fight the war.
     The other two reporters were quite familiar with the map, and we soon found out why: neither had been to the field with the army more than once or twice; they did most of their reporting from that very briefing room. In fact, there were few foreign journalists in Laos, and they almost never went on operations. Laotian journalists, the general said, never went on operations, period. Truly, the forgotten war... it was forgotten even by the nation and the army who were supposed to be fighting it.
     The general was pointing out some positions along "The [Ho Chi Minh] Trail," and saying that there would be a major sweep of the area in a couple of days. Manyon and I asked if we could go along.

     He shook his head, replying that he had more trouble trying to protect people like us who ran around his country trying to see the war than he did in fighting the enemy. He was especially negative about the Frenchmen who occasionally went into the hinterlands to talk to the Pathet Lao. As the briefing wore on, the general again launched into a stream of complaints about how the world wouldn't believe his plight, so I jumped on him: "General, if you want people to believe you, why won't you let journalists go to the field with your army? Surely you don't expect us to write only what you tell us. But we'll write anything we see, if you'll let us go out there."
     "That's bullshit!" blurted out the reporter from the Mirror. He proceeded to call us a couple of punk kids who didn't know anything about war, and who'd only go out and get ourselves shot up and ruin things for the professional journalists. We countered that we'd both been shot at ‑ probably more than he had ‑ and that we felt that journalism's first requirement was to go where the story was. He was still scornful, and angry at our attempted usurpation of his territory. General Sananikone finally acquiesced and gave us a note, in Khmer typescript, which he said directed his subordinates to render us assistance commensurate with operational requirements.

     Sunday morning ‑ less than two days after the pilots were released ‑ we were sitting on the runway in the shade of one wing of the C‑47 which was to take us south to Savannakhet, headquarters for the operation we'd finally gotten permission to cover. It was a long wait, and as we got up to wander around and stretch our legs, the Laotian Air Force pilot eyed us nervously. Once Manyon asked if he could go down to the end of the runway where the T‑28 fighter squadron was located. He was told emphatically that he could not.
     About mid‑morning, a small, olive drab, twin‑engine aircraft landed, taxied to a position across the runway from us, and stopped. Black letters along the fuselage plainly spelled out U S Army. I had seen similar aircraft in Vietnam; it was a Mohawk reconnaissance plane. But in Laos, unless the pilot were a civilian, the thing's presence and activities would be illegal.
     Perhaps the pilot was a civilian. But this question occurred to a lot of people who observed "civilian" American pilots at work in Laos: what is the difference between a military man and a civilian on a military mission?
     Manyon finally went up to the Laotian pilot and told him that he had to go to the bathroom, period, and asked if there were a toilet in the hangar of the fighter squadron. The pilot said yes, and reluctantly let him go. He had been gone nearly half an hour when our plane began to load, so I ran down to the hangar to look for him. I tried a couple of doors; both were locked. A little farther down, a tall, sandy‑haired American was wheeling a single‑engine aircraft into the hangar by means of a long tool attached to its rear wheel. I walked over to him.
     "Hey, did you see a tall British kid around here?" I asked. "Came to go to the bathroom."

     "Nope, I sure didn't," he replied. "But if he's in there..." ‑ he pointed to the enclosed end of the hangar ‑ "...he's locked in, 'cause I locked the door when I came out."

     We walked over and he pulled out a ring of keys and unlocked the door. Manyon came out and we hurried across the runway to our plane. On the way he told me that he'd walked right into a pilots' ready room just like the ones in Vietnam, with Playboy foldouts all over the walls, and about half a dozen Americans sitting around playing cards and drinking beer. I had stumbled into a similar scene earlier, as we passed through one of the Laotian towns. Weary of hitchhiking, we'd been poking around an airstrip trying to finagle a ride on one of the many airplanes we had seen taxiing, taking off and landing. This more convenient sort of hitchhiking had been standard procedure for journalists in Vietnam. In that earlier situation, I'd finally been motioned toward an open side door of a metal hangar building. I stepped inside as I knocked. There were two or three American men wearing grey uniforms similar to those worn by Greyhound bus drivers. Each had a very small shoulder patch which said "Air America," and was wearing a flak jacket and a pistol in a shoulder holster. Since they were obviously dressed for adventure, I asked if a couple of journalists could ride along, see what the war was like in Laos. Not a chance. I was told that they were civilians, that they carried only civilian cargo, that there really wasn't much of a war going on, and besides their contract forbade them to haul unauthorized passengers.

     The commanding officer at Thakkek was as cordial as the others had been, though we woke him from his afternoon nap. He listened as we explained that the operation out of Savannakhet had been cancelled, and that we had been advised to view some of the forward positions around Thakkek if we wanted to get a view of the Laotian army in the field. Apparently there was actually a "front line" at a distance of about twenty‑four kilometers from town, beyond which North Vietnamese forces held sway.
     After reading General Sananikone’s letter of authorization, the colonel was amenable. He dispatched his driver to take us to a restaurant in town while he finished his nap, then the driver returned and took us to his office. It was a bare room with a desk, a couple of guest chairs, and a wall map with le front sketched neatly on an acetate overlay in black grease pencil. The colonel pointed out the relative positions of the RLG and North Vietnamese forces, and said that he had made arrangements for us to be taken to a forward position. We sat down to wait for the vehicle.

     There was hardly anything on the colonel's desk. He turned his attention to a small neat pile of white papers directly in front of him, each of which had a few lines of Laotian script ‑ it looked like Sanskrit, to my ignorant eye ‑ typed across the middle. He would pick up the top paper, peruse it carefully, think about it for a moment, then sign it with a flourish and set it down to his right. After about every other signature, he would tap a little bell on the corner of his desk. An enlisted man would come in, valiantly attempt to stand at attention, then pick up the papers and leave. The colonel would sign a couple of more sheets, and ring the bell again.
     After a time a young lieutenant entered the room; the colonel introduced him, saying that he would be our escort to the front, would serve as our interpreter while there (he spoke French; Manyon would translate for me), and would render us any assistance possible. We shook hands and took leave of the colonel. He smiled and said, "attention la moustique." Watch out for mosquitoes.
     The driver was a young ragamuffin straight out of the jungle. He wore an old baseball cap perched on top of a shock of long black hair that made him look like one of the Apaches out of an old western movie. His uniform was made up of accumulated parts, and he seemed continuously conscious of the fact that he was wearing boots. His weapon was an old M‑1 rifle with the blueing gone from the barrel.

     The jeep's battery was dead, so we had to push the thing to get it started. It was twelve kilometers ‑ seven and a half miles ‑ to the headquarters of the company we were to visit; it would be that far again to the forward position. It was already late afternoon when the jeep coughed its way up the last hill before the headquarters area, sputtered, and died. As we got out of the jeep, the garrison of some twenty little brown soldiers was being dismissed from its evening muster, which consisted of a formation of two lines held in the road where it went between two huge rocky crags to disappear in the jungle. That was the only place around flat enough to hold a formation. The ex‑Marine in me watched as the command for attention was given and the assortment of boots, sandals, and bare feet come together in what I thought was a pathetic attempt at unison.
     The company commander had spent some time training at a U.S. Army base in Texas, so we had to talk for a while about Texas, though I had never been there, and Manyon had never even been to the States. He was as eager to help us as the other Laotian officers had been; in fact, we again got the impression that the visit of two foreign correspondents ‑ the first ever at that position ‑ was more important to him than his immediate responsibility to the war effort.
     The ridges on both sides of the camp were high and abrupt; darkness fell quickly. The company commander got on the field telephone and tried to get another vehicle for us. He couldn't. He shrugged, and asked apologetically if we wanted to walk. I thought it a rather bald attempt to discourage us yet again, and we'd already spent too many precious days trying to see the Royal Laotian Army "in action." So we said yes. The lieutenant who was our escort squawked, but the captain shut him up. It was raining lightly when we started out.

     A squad of soldiers accompanied us. But for us, they would have been able to wait until morning came and the rain lifted before returning to the front. But they went, and we went, swinging along in the wet dark. What we began to learn about them during that walk would later become strikingly clear: while it was true that they wore semblances of uniforms and carried weapons, they were not so much soldiers as simple jungle people who had finally been touched by the outstretched tentacles of government.
     So we walked with these little soldiers through the night and the rain, deeper into the rain forest. There was no measure of time or distance until the road ended at a bridge made of rickety poles. We crossed carefully, one by one, and started into the minute tunnel through dense foliage which the trail entered on the other side. The soldiers were no longer talkative, although they did not seem afraid. At intervals they would stop for a moment and listen, then continue.
     Finally at one of these listening stops we were met by a sentry who was no more than a low voice in the soggy blackness. Once we had left the road behind, there was no more sky, and therefore no more rain. We moved through foliage beneath three layers of jungle canopy; there the rain fell on the top layer and worked its way down until it dripped on us from the leaves directly overhead, and was brushed onto us as we shouldered our way through the undergrowth.

     We turned off the trail there and moved into a low semi‑clearing where water stood calf‑deep on the jungle floor, and shadowy figures moved by flashlight beams along pole bridges between tiny thatched huts which stood on stilts above the water. A voice with a flashlight showed us a hut where we could wait out the night and the rain. The floor extended out from the front wall to form a small porch. You backed up to this porch and sat down on it and took off your boots or sandals and left them in the corner so as not to carry mud into the hut. The roof extended out as far as the floor, and since the water only fell straight down because it dripped from the underside of the jungle canopy rather than falling from the sky, it wouldn't get in our boots.
     I tried to stretch out on the bamboo floor, but couldn't. The hut had been made for people a head shorter than me. It was one of those situations I had met so many times in Southeast Asia which said, "You are a stranger here." I put my head down on a hard lump, and unwrapped it to find, carefully oiled and stored and long unused, a US A6 .30 caliber machine gun. There was no other place to put the gun; the hut wasn’t even big enough for Manyon and me. I rewrapped it and used it for a pillow.
     So just when the business of the too‑small hut finished saying, "You are a stranger here," the gun added, "So are the things you bring with you."

     Morning never really came. The process was so slow that instead of greeting the dawn, we came to realize that the night must have left because there was enough light to see the blue smoke that hung over the pools of water in the clearing, and the clusters of little brown people who sat on the porches of their huts and waited for the rain to stop. It seemed that their very lives consisted of waiting for the rain to stop. They did it patiently, because there was really nothing for them to do when it did stop except to put pots of rice and meat on to cook over smoky wood fires.
     There was a break in the jungle canopy off a ways in front of our hut, and gradually the rain stopped falling through it and above the sky began to emerge and lighten, and then a great jutting ridge appeared out of the fog opposite the clearing. Shafts of sunlight fell through the opening in the canopy, heating the pools of water until the clearing was a steamy, other‑worldly place.
     We ate a meal of rice and meat with the officers at a bamboo table under its own thatched roof. The rice was kept and served in wonderful, tightly-woven little cylindrical baskets, with tops that slipped over in a close fit and were held in place by a fiber loop which also served as a carrying handle. They gave me one of the baskets. (Some days later, as I walked about forty kilometers south from the Cambodian border before I caught a ride the remaining few kilometers into Stung Treng, the sticky rice in that Laotian lunch bucket, and the water I scooped from the ditch beside the road and treated in my canteen with halazone tablets, kept me alive for a day's hard walking.)     

     The French‑speaking lieutenant, like the captain we'd met earlier, had been to Texas for training. So again Manyon and I had to try to talk about Texas. As we were finishing the meal, the lieutenant jerked his chin toward a pretty young woman seated a few yards away with her back leaned against one of the large stones that dotted the clearing. He asked Manyon a question in French, which he translated: "Do you want to fuck her?" We both declined. I'm sure she knew what was said, though it was in French. She just sat and looked at us. I have often wondered what she was thinking. I have also realized, over the years, that a part of me had wanted to say yes.
     None of the soldiers were eager to move; we had to wheedle them into taking us to "le front." We waded through the jungle for a few hundred yards until we came to another of those abrupt rock formations, and began to climb. The soldiers were like cliff dwellers, clambering up the steep face with the ease of experience. The rock was brittle and had broken up into knife‑edged chunks. Some of the soldiers climbed these with bare feet. During our mealtime chat we'd learned that it was the army's policy to go to an area like this and draft the people who lived there in the jungle, then assign some officers and noncoms to form a military unit, and leave it there as a garrison.

     We climbed almost straight up, past tiny huts perched in crevices where women with blank brown faces sat waiting in silence. It was strange, the way they looked. It wasn't as if they were waiting for something. They were just waiting.
     We finally came to a pocket on the crest of the ridge where we could stand and see over. The spine of rock was so steep that we could lean against it and still be standing. The lieutenant who was our escort did this and tentatively raised his head above the ridgeline, motioning to the canopied hills that stretched away below. "Le front," he said.
     That was all there was to the front, and to the existence of the small band of people who spent their days and nights squatting on the porches of the huts back in the clearing, or perched in the sheltered places on the south side of this massive chunk of black rock: a place out there where no one ever went, where it was said that the North Vietnamese troops sat and waited out the weeks and months as they did, and from where, once in a while when a Laotian soldier would silhouette himself against the skyline, a shot would come.

     I was alone in southern Laos. Manyon had crossed the Mekong to Thailand; I was headed back to Phnom Penh for a flight to Saigon and another to the States. Fall semester would be starting soon.

     I'd come to an unmarked crossroads and taken the wrong fork. I was lost. All I saw was a narrow road and two walls of jungle that nearly closed out the sky above it. No humans, no peasant huts, not even a blown bridge or an abandoned guard shack. I walked the road. Finally a large building of weathered boards came into view. I stepped onto its high porch, halloed. No answer. The building was open, but no one was around. It seemed there hadn't been anyone around for a long time, though it was clean and in good repair. There was no hint of what the building had been used for. Maybe meetings, maybe classes... I couldn’t tell.
     Looking through an open window, I saw the only evidence, besides the building itself, of human presence: a life-size, nicely framed, official portrait of Lyndon Baines Johnson.


[1] The word on the ground among Americans in Southeast Asia was that these new rice hybrids might revolutionize rice production in the entire Mekong region. I remember the name Rockefeller as being attached to them.